| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Command Triggers |
| Date: | 2011-12-14 14:05:24 |
| Message-ID: | 1323871368-sup-4185@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of mié dic 14 07:22:21 -0300 2011:
> Again, that's a caveat of the first implementation, you can't have sub
> commands support without forcing them through ProcessUtility and that's
> a much more invasive patch. Maybe we will need that later.
I can get behind this argument: force all stuff through ProcessUtility
for regularity, and not necessarily in the first patch for this feature.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-12-14 14:31:45 | Re: pg_dump --exclude-table-data |
| Previous Message | Shigeru Hanada | 2011-12-14 14:02:28 | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |