Re: pg_dump --exclude-table-data

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump --exclude-table-data
Date: 2011-12-14 14:48:26
Message-ID: CAEYLb_VDh=3YYpsOtAE4s_QGGCqgUiM7CA6uBNku3MUh6G_FCg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14 December 2011 14:31, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

> Thanks. Committed with that changed, although we seem to be getting
> altogether too obsessive about white space, IMNSHO.

I agree, but I think it's important that we judge patches by a
consistent standard. Right now, for better or worse, that standard
includes being obsessed with white space.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Shulgin 2011-12-14 14:52:29 Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq
Previous Message Mark Cave-Ayland 2011-12-14 14:44:24 Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64