| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jaime Casanova" <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Joshua Kramer" <josh(at)globalherald(dot)net>, "Ian Bailey-Leung" <ian(at)hardcircle(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Date: | 2011-05-04 20:26:43 |
| Message-ID: | 4DC17033020000250003D2B3@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
>> +1 for Fast Tables.
>
> so, if i want my database to be fast i have to use those? that
> name is pretty misleading.
If we're talking about marketing jargon, how about getting *really*
out there with "lightening tables". Built for speed but not
persistence.
Hey, nobody liked evanescent, so I'm trying a different route...
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA) | 2011-05-04 21:30:40 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-05-04 20:19:06 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomasz Chmielewski | 2011-05-04 20:27:44 | Re: 'SGT DETAIL: Could not open file "pg_clog/05DC": No such file or directory' - what to do now? |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-05-04 20:19:06 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |