From: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Joshua Kramer <josh(at)globalherald(dot)net>, Ian Bailey-Leung <ian(at)hardcircle(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
Date: | 2011-05-04 21:50:44 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTi=mPWwxaju72VuyEBrQLRUDcL0Gqw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
>
>>> +1 for Fast Tables.
>>
>> so, if i want my database to be fast i have to use those? that
>> name is pretty misleading.
>
> If we're talking about marketing jargon, how about getting *really*
> out there with "lightening tables". Built for speed but not
> persistence.
>
oh! that's easy! "mysql tables" or "pgISAM tables" ;)
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2011-05-04 21:52:08 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2011-05-04 21:44:53 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2011-05-04 21:52:08 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2011-05-04 21:44:53 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |