| From: | "Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)" <bnicholson(at)hp(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Joshua Kramer <josh(at)globalherald(dot)net>, Ian Bailey-Leung <ian(at)hardcircle(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Date: | 2011-05-04 21:30:40 |
| Message-ID: | 2626AEE4839D064CB0472A3814DC403F46D5151748@GVW1092EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-
> owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Kevin Grittner
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:27 PM
> To: Jaime Casanova; David Fetter
> Cc: Josh Berkus; Joshua Kramer; Ian Bailey-Leung; PostgreSQL Advocacy
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Unlogged vs. In-Memory
>
> Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
>
> >> +1 for Fast Tables.
> >
> > so, if i want my database to be fast i have to use those? that
> > name is pretty misleading.
>
> If we're talking about marketing jargon, how about getting *really*
> out there with "lightening tables". Built for speed but not
> persistence.
What about something like "Write Accelerated Tables"?
Brad.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2011-05-04 21:44:53 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-05-04 20:26:43 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2011-05-04 21:44:53 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-05-04 21:05:42 | Re: Predicate locking |