On 18/01/11 18:04, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter<david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
>> Who's the copyright holder(s)? If it's all individual contributors,
>> Red Hat policy is not in play.
> Sorry David, it was written on the company's dime.
>
However, I doubt that Red Hat derives any value from this useful product
being excluded from contrib by the choice of license - would they be
receptive to the idea that it would be free marketing to have it in the
main tarball/rpm/deb (etc) with merely a decision to change it GPL->BSD?
regards
Mark