Re: Configuring synchronous replication

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Configuring synchronous replication
Date: 2010-09-24 14:15:53
Message-ID: 4C9CB299.3030502@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On 24/09/10 17:13, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 16:01 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>
>> I'd like that we now follow Josh Berkus (and some other) advice now, and
>> start a new thread to decide what we mean by synchronous replication,
>> what kind of normal behaviour we want and what responses to errors we
>> expect to be able to deal with in what (optional) ways.
>
> What I intend to do from here is make a list of all desired use cases,
> then ask for people to propose ways of configuring those. Hopefully we
> don't need to discuss the meaning of the phrase "sync rep", we just need
> to look at the use cases.

Yes, that seems like a good way forward.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-09-24 15:29:55 Re: Configuring synchronous replication
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-09-24 14:13:13 Re: Configuring synchronous replication

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-09-24 14:42:48 Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #5650: Postgres service showing as stopped when in fact it is running
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-09-24 14:15:08 Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #5650: Postgres service showing as stopped when in fact it is running