| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>,"David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Version Numbering |
| Date: | 2010-08-20 20:00:19 |
| Message-ID: | 4C6E988302000025000349AD@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
>>> .0 is for releases, not betas. I see no need for an extra
>>> number in beta versions.
>
> Yes, well, it's still implicit, isn't it?
Not the way I read it. If we had a development cycle which resulted
in 8.4.5beta4, then you would have a point. We don't.
Now, if you wanted to argue that it would be better to use 9.0.beta4
than 9.0beta4, that might be defensible. I think I like that
better; but I'm not inclined to think the difference is worth the
pain of changing an established convention.
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2010-08-20 20:02:46 | Re: [Glue] Deadlock bug |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-20 19:59:05 | Re: Deadlock bug |