Re: [Glue] Deadlock bug

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)gluefinance(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, glue(at)pgexperts(dot)com, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Glue] Deadlock bug
Date: 2010-08-20 20:02:46
Message-ID: AANLkTi=1qAYmEvWx0LJhYgjz1+Ks7STf0Ayr73JVs-pj@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)gluefinance(dot)com> wrote:
> OK. Thanks for the explanation. It's probably the case in general, but in
> all of my tests (>10), process 2 always aborts. I don't think it is
> arbitrary in this example, or could it be?

Well, note the part where I said "if it does other stuff first". It's
arbitrary in that it depends on the timing in ways that aren't
obvious. If you're doing the same thing every time you'll trigger the
same arbitrary behavious.
--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-08-20 20:03:57 Re: Version Numbering
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-08-20 20:00:19 Re: Version Numbering