Re: Version Numbering

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Version Numbering
Date: 2010-08-20 19:46:28
Message-ID: 04F4CDDE-886D-4F51-8BDD-31911532CF36@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Aug 20, 2010, at 12:21 PM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:

> +1 for Tom's post.
>
> 20.Ağu.2010 tarihinde 21:40 saatinde, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> şunları yazdı:
>
>> .0 is for releases, not betas. I see no need for an extra number in
>> beta versions.

Yes, well, it's still implicit, isn't it?

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-08-20 19:47:03 Re: COPY FROM/TO losing a single byte of a multibyte UTF-8 sequence
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-08-20 19:27:21 Re: git: uh-oh