Re: A few new options for vacuumdb

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A few new options for vacuumdb
Date: 2019-01-31 15:41:34
Message-ID: 4B7CA7E4-7044-4133-924A-E7710920CA78@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/30/19, 8:21 PM, "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Fixed and committed. So we are finally done here, except for the
> debate with the relation size.

Thanks for the diligent reviews, as always. I don't plan to pick up
--min-relation-size right now, but I may attempt it again in a future
commitfest.

Nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-01-31 15:42:52 Re: Global snapshots
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-01-31 15:39:46 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting