Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Date: 2019-01-31 15:39:46
Message-ID: 201901311539.756v733vmk3u@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Would anybody object to me pushing part 0001 soon? It seems pointless
to force Dmitry keep rebasing a huge renaming patch all this time. I
think the general feeling is that this is a desirable change, so let's
keep things moving.

That having been said ... while the current 0001 patch does apply
semi-cleanly (`git apply -3` does it), it does not compile, probably
because of header refactoring. Please rebase and make sure that each
individual patch compiles cleanly.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2019-01-31 15:41:34 Re: A few new options for vacuumdb
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2019-01-31 15:26:31 Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards