Re: A few new options for vacuumdb

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A few new options for vacuumdb
Date: 2019-01-31 04:20:24
Message-ID: 20190131042024.GH16781@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 02:28:05AM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> It looks good to me. The only thing I noticed is the use of
> relfrozenxid instead of relminmxid here:

Fixed and committed. So we are finally done here, except for the
debate with the relation size.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2019-01-31 04:22:07 Re: [HACKERS] Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2019-01-31 03:45:23 Re: psql exit status with multiple -c or -f