From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
---|---|
To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgFoundry Download URLs |
Date: | 2010-01-03 14:06:04 |
Message-ID: | 4B40A44C.6040906@kaltenbrunner.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2010, at 7:01 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>
>> On the other hand we got more than 50 project applications this year(not all of the accepted) so there seems to be a need and an interest from the community for a postgresql centric project hosting infrastructure.
>
> Yes, but are those people applying to pgFoundry to take advantage of the tools, or to have a presence in the community? I'll bet that the latter is usually the more important reason, since there are better tools elsewhere.
I cannot really answer that question but I guess it is a bit of both. As
in for most of the simple projects the tools are still "good enough" and
you get the community presence on top of that.
Stefan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Smet | 2010-01-03 14:17:38 | Re: pgFoundry Download URLs |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-01-03 12:29:06 | Re: pgFoundry Download URLs |