Re: pgFoundry Download URLs

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgFoundry Download URLs
Date: 2010-01-03 18:50:05
Message-ID: E551DDC4-A8CB-4417-86F0-519BAF7F7966@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Jan 3, 2010, at 6:06 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:

>> Yes, but are those people applying to pgFoundry to take advantage of the tools, or to have a presence in the community? I'll bet that the latter is usually the more important reason, since there are better tools elsewhere.
>
> I cannot really answer that question but I guess it is a bit of both. As in for most of the simple projects the tools are still "good enough" and you get the community presence on top of that.

Except that: a. There are better tools available that provide higher visibility in general; and b. The community presence acquired as a result of being on pgFoundry is, as Magnus parentheticaly indicated and I agree, negligible.

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message webmaster 2010-01-04 14:00:00 PostgreSQL moderation report: 2010-1-4
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-01-03 15:04:43 Re: pgFoundry Download URLs