| From: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Radamanthus Batnag <rad(dot)batnag(at)devex(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WAL file compatibility |
| Date: | 2009-10-26 04:46:01 |
| Message-ID: | 4AE52989.80703@pinpointresearch.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Tom Lane wrote:
> ...
> The source and destination servers have to be the same major PG release,
> same architecture (no 32-bit vs 64-bit for instance), and built with the
> same configure options. OS per se shouldn't matter, but you could
> easily get burnt on configure options if you use binaries obtained from
> different packagers. Compare pg_config output or check the fields
> listed by pg_controldata.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
Out of curiosity, will Pg automatically detect incompatible WAL files
and refuse to operate on them throwing the appropriate error or can it
appear to work for a while until it suddenly doesn't?
Cheers,
Steve
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | rahimeh khodadadi | 2009-10-26 07:54:14 | Fwd: configuration kerberos in Postgre sql |
| Previous Message | Steve Crawford | 2009-10-26 04:41:56 | Re: pg_attribute size |