Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Rod Taylor <rod(dot)taylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
Date: 2009-10-15 03:51:13
Message-ID: 4AD69C31.50408@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> They are probably quite open to changing it, but IIRC it is a setting
>> imposed by OpenACS, which is what they are based on.
>>
>
> I seem to recall having asked this before ... but does OpenACS even
> know what they're doing here? The difference between ERE mode and ARE
> mode is awfully slight.
>

That's not the worst of it :-( See
<http://openacs.org/xowiki/How_to_install_in_Postgres_8.x>

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2009-10-15 04:13:05 Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-10-15 03:15:45 Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls