Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rod Taylor <rod(dot)taylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
Date: 2009-10-15 04:13:05
Message-ID: 20091015041305.GB18784@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:51:13PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>
>>> They are probably quite open to changing it, but IIRC it is a
>>> setting imposed by OpenACS, which is what they are based on.
>>
>> I seem to recall having asked this before ... but does OpenACS even
>> know what they're doing here? The difference between ERE mode and
>> ARE mode is awfully slight.
>
> That's not the worst of it :-( See
> <http://openacs.org/xowiki/How_to_install_in_Postgres_8.x>

This just illustrates the fact that at least as far as PostgreSQL is
concerned, OpenACS is a dead project. It's been at least 3 major
versions since they even attempted to keep compatible with PostgreSQL.

OpenACS could be revived as a PostgreSQL-supporting piece of software,
and that might be a good thing. It would entail adjusting OpenACS to
the things PostgreSQL has changed rather than the reverse.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itagaki Takahiro 2009-10-15 04:18:31 Re: Skip WAL in ALTER TABLE
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-10-15 03:51:13 Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?