Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Rod Taylor <rod(dot)taylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
Date: 2009-10-15 02:20:21
Message-ID: 20441.1255573221@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> They are probably quite open to changing it, but IIRC it is a setting
> imposed by OpenACS, which is what they are based on.

I seem to recall having asked this before ... but does OpenACS even
know what they're doing here? The difference between ERE mode and ARE
mode is awfully slight.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-10-15 03:15:45 Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-10-15 02:13:57 Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?