Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal
Date: 2009-10-04 18:42:45
Message-ID: 4AC8ECA5.2030504@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> There are already patches to deal with the first, at least for the
> kinds of VIEWs where this can be deduced automatically, and people are
> starting to take on the second.

How would we deal with VIEWs which weren't simple enough for automated
updating, then?

I don't think that removing a major feature, one which some users have
written applications around, is even feasible.

What would be the benefit of this radical proposal?

--Josh Berkus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-10-04 18:44:51 Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs
Previous Message David Fetter 2009-10-04 17:54:13 Rules: A Modest Proposal