Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal

On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 11:42:45AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > There are already patches to deal with the first, at least for the
> > kinds of VIEWs where this can be deduced automatically, and people
> > are starting to take on the second.
>
> How would we deal with VIEWs which weren't simple enough for
> automated updating, then?

View triggers, as proposed.

> I don't think that removing a major feature, one which some users
> have written applications around, is even feasible.

*I've* written an application around them, and frankly, they are a
giant foot-gun in every case that's not already handle-able other
ways.

> What would be the benefit of this radical proposal?

The radical proposal was the RULE system. It's been tested now, and
it's pretty much failed.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate