Re: "Hot standby"?

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "Hot standby"?
Date: 2009-08-11 13:56:38
Message-ID: 4A813246020000250002985D@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> OK, so it is "warm slave".

That is technically accurate, given the preceding definitions, but it
has disturbing connotations. Enough so, in my view, to merit getting
a little more creative in the naming. How about "warm replica"?
Other ideas?

I agree that the present moniker misleads.

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-08-11 14:02:01 Re: Shipping documentation untarred
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-08-11 13:54:55 Re: Quick pointer required re indexing geometry