Re: "Hot standby"?

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "Hot standby"?
Date: 2009-08-11 16:08:05
Message-ID: 20090811160805.GE27891@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 08:56:38AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > OK, so it is "warm slave".
>
> That is technically accurate, given the preceding definitions, but
> it has disturbing connotations. Enough so, in my view, to merit
> getting a little more creative in the naming. How about "warm
> replica"? Other ideas?

Warm Read
Streamed Copy

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-08-11 16:11:49 Re: machine-readable explain output v4
Previous Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2009-08-11 16:02:35 Re: Split-up ECPG patches