Re: New trigger option of pg_standby

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
Date: 2009-03-27 11:56:16
Message-ID: 49CCBEE0.1080307@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> If we go with this, I would suggest we make *neither* the default by
> removing -t, and adopting two new options: something like -f == fast
> failover, -p == patient failover.

-m smart|fast|immediate :-)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2009-03-27 12:03:25 Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-03-27 11:49:51 Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets