| From: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |
| Date: | 2009-03-27 12:19:05 |
| Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10903270519p556649bfr9b19f9156c43be4b@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>> If we go with this, I would suggest we make *neither* the default by
>> removing -t, and adopting two new options: something like -f == fast
>> failover, -p == patient failover.
>
> -m smart|fast|immediate :-)
The advantage of having 2 options (or the ability to put a string
value in the trigger file) is that you can choose the behaviour when
you need to trigger it (you just have to use the 2 options with 2
different filenames). I don't think it's the case with your proposal.
--
Guillaume
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2009-03-27 12:46:32 | Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-03-27 12:03:25 | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |