| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |
| Date: | 2009-03-27 12:03:25 |
| Message-ID: | 1238155405.16568.593.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 13:56 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > If we go with this, I would suggest we make *neither* the default by
> > removing -t, and adopting two new options: something like -f == fast
> > failover, -p == patient failover.
>
> -m smart|fast|immediate :-)
Yes, a better suggestion.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Smet | 2009-03-27 12:19:05 | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-03-27 11:56:16 | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |