Re: dblink vs SQL/MED

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: dblink vs SQL/MED
Date: 2008-12-20 18:53:45
Message-ID: 494D3F39.9090703@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter wrote:
>> SQL/MED catalog manipulation facilities
>>
>> This doesn't do any remote or external things yet, but it gives modules
>> like plproxy and dblink a standardized and future-proof system for
>> managing their connection information.
>
> It seems this is a pile of pretty useless code, so far as the core
> distribution is concerned, unless somebody fixes dblink to use it.
> Is that on anyone's radar for 8.4?

How much time is left to get it done? I might be able to find some time
on the weekend after Christmas, or the weekend after New Years day -- is
that soon enough?

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-12-20 19:08:00 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Append major version number and for libraries soname major
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-12-20 17:33:17 dblink vs SQL/MED