| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: dblink vs SQL/MED |
| Date: | 2008-12-20 21:35:39 |
| Message-ID: | 22157.1229808939@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> It seems this is a pile of pretty useless code, so far as the core
>> distribution is concerned, unless somebody fixes dblink to use it.
>> Is that on anyone's radar for 8.4?
> How much time is left to get it done? I might be able to find some time
> on the weekend after Christmas, or the weekend after New Years day -- is
> that soon enough?
Well, it seems quite clear to me that we're not entering beta on Jan 1.
And even if we were, we've traditionally cut more slack for contrib
modules than the core database. So if you can do something about it in
the next few weeks, that'd be great.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-12-20 21:37:49 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Append major version number and for libraries soname major |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-12-20 20:07:35 | Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items |