Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux

From: "James B(dot) Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux
Date: 2010-12-07 22:15:45
Message-ID: 49354.216.185.71.25.1291760145.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Tue, December 7, 2010 16:56, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>
> No those lib differences are both still 32bit. You would have a
> problem if one was 64bit. So you should be fine there.
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>

Ok. How do I get postgresql to cough up more processing detail on
startup? The message that I presently get makes no sense at all to
me.

--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB(at)Harte-Lyne(dot)ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-12-07 22:36:59 Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-12-07 21:56:04 Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux