Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux
Date: 2010-12-07 22:36:59
Message-ID: 29919.1291761419@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"James B. Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca> writes:
> Ok. How do I get postgresql to cough up more processing detail on
> startup? The message that I presently get makes no sense at all to
> me.

The message isn't coming from postgres --- it's openssl that you're
wishing would be more verbose.

What I'd try next is strace'ing the postmaster so you can see what
happened right before the error report. With luck that will point you
at a specific configuration file that's (presumably) messed up.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Swisher 2010-12-08 00:19:02 pg_standby logging issues
Previous Message James B. Byrne 2010-12-07 22:15:45 Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux