Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux

From: Ray Stell <stellr(at)cns(dot)vt(dot)edu>
To: "James B(dot) Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux
Date: 2010-12-08 01:03:22
Message-ID: 20101208010321.GA6699@cns.vt.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:15:45PM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Tue, December 7, 2010 16:56, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >
> > No those lib differences are both still 32bit. You would have a
> > problem if one was 64bit. So you should be fine there.
> >
> > Joshua D. Drake
> >
>
> Ok. How do I get postgresql to cough up more processing detail on
> startup? The message that I presently get makes no sense at all to
> me.

do we know that pg was compiled with ssl? maybe a bonehead question,
but low hanging fruit is my specialty.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-12-08 01:53:30 Re: Uncommitted Data
Previous Message Jonathan Tripathy 2010-12-08 00:56:11 Uncommitted Data