| From: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Script binaries renaming |
| Date: | 2008-03-26 15:47:21 |
| Message-ID: | 47EA7009.4090504@sun.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane napsal(a):
> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>>> There's an awful lot of names here that don't have any obvious
>>> connection to Postgres ...
>
>> Why we have pg_dump and pg_dumpall? Or I think pg_resetxlog has same
>> output like pg_controldata. I think we can merge these commands.
>
> Now we're into change for the sake of change? Those programs don't
> have any naming problem.
yes, but they are redundant and I think when we start a cleaning and polishing
it should be done completely. But names are correct :-)
Zdenek
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-26 15:58:52 | Re: advancing snapshot's xmin |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-26 15:41:32 | Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-03-26 16:17:19 | Re: Script binaries renaming |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-03-26 15:42:01 | Re: \password in psql help |