Re: Script binaries renaming

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Script binaries renaming
Date: 2008-03-26 15:31:44
Message-ID: 21491.1206545504@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>> There's an awful lot of names here that don't have any obvious
>> connection to Postgres ...

> Why we have pg_dump and pg_dumpall? Or I think pg_resetxlog has same
> output like pg_controldata. I think we can merge these commands.

Now we're into change for the sake of change? Those programs don't
have any naming problem.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gurjeet Singh 2008-03-26 15:32:21 Re: having problem in rsync'ing cvs
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-26 15:27:48 Re: Script binaries renaming

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-26 15:35:22 Re: \password in psql help
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-26 15:27:48 Re: Script binaries renaming