| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Script binaries renaming |
| Date: | 2008-03-26 16:17:19 |
| Message-ID: | 47EA770F.3050705@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Tom Lane napsal(a):
>> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>>> Why we have pg_dump and pg_dumpall? Or I think pg_resetxlog has same
>>> output like pg_controldata. I think we can merge these commands.
>>
>> Now we're into change for the sake of change? Those programs don't
>> have any naming problem.
>
> yes, but they are redundant
>
>
Really? How so? They have overlapping functionality, but neither has a
subset of the other's functionality.
Possibly we should merge them, but that's a different issue, and in
particular has nothing to do with renaming, so it doesn't belong in this
thread.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-03-26 16:24:18 | Re: Script binaries renaming |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2008-03-26 16:05:33 | Re: advancing snapshot's xmin |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-03-26 16:24:18 | Re: Script binaries renaming |
| Previous Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-03-26 15:47:21 | Re: Script binaries renaming |