| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: win32 threads patch vs beta2 - what to do? |
| Date: | 2007-10-26 21:49:58 |
| Message-ID: | 47226106.2050906@hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:58:03 +0100
> Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> I'm leaning towards applying the patch now, and hoping for 2b to
>>> happen.
>> I think we should live with the mingw BF breakage for a day or two.
>> The patch is clearly an important improvement, but it should be as
>> widely tested as possible.
>
> I think this makes sense. I certainly don't want to hold back Beta2 and
> this patch so far is an obvious improvement.
I read the consensus of this thread as "apply the patch as-is and let's
fix mingw as soon as we can", so this is what I've done. If I got it
wrong, feel free to back out :-)
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-10-26 22:01:54 | Re: PANIC caused by open_sync on Linux |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-10-26 21:46:59 | Re: WAL archiving idle database |