Re: PANIC caused by open_sync on Linux

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PANIC caused by open_sync on Linux
Date: 2007-10-26 22:01:54
Message-ID: 20071026220154.GF8655@crankycanuck.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 08:34:49AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> we only check for the case once per checkpoint and we don't create a
> segment unless there's very little space left.

Sort of a filthy hack, but what about always having an _extra_
segment around? The bgwriter could do that, no?

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-10-26 22:47:35 Re: WAL archiving idle database
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-10-26 21:49:58 Re: win32 threads patch vs beta2 - what to do?