Re: win32 threads patch vs beta2 - what to do?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: win32 threads patch vs beta2 - what to do?
Date: 2007-10-26 21:12:12
Message-ID: 20071026141212.634690d9@scratch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:58:03 +0100
Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:

> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > I'm leaning towards applying the patch now, and hoping for 2b to
> > happen.
>
> I think we should live with the mingw BF breakage for a day or two.
> The patch is clearly an important improvement, but it should be as
> widely tested as possible.

I think this makes sense. I certainly don't want to hold back Beta2 and
this patch so far is an obvious improvement.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> /D
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the
> postmaster
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-10-26 21:18:03 Re: win32 threads patch vs beta2 - what to do?
Previous Message Brian Wipf 2007-10-26 21:08:12 WAL archiving idle database