| From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Date: | 2007-10-09 20:36:28 |
| Message-ID: | 470BE64C.9010905@kaltenbrunner.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> I don't see how timing has anything to do with this. You could have
>>>>> added it between beta1 and beta2 after sufficient hackers discussion.
>>>>>
>>>> Uh, it *was* after beta1.
>>>>
>>> Oh, so it didn't hold up beta1 --- that's good.
>>>
>>>
>> No it's not.
>>
>> Can somebody please explain to me what beta means if you can commit new
>> stuff after it has been declared?
>
> We allow /contrib to be more lax about beta changes.
the postgresql ecosystem is growing and there is a lot of people like
packagers that will be a quite irritated if we keep randomly adding
completely new code and modules during BETA.
Stefan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-10-09 20:37:36 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-10-09 20:35:03 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-10-09 20:37:36 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-10-09 20:35:03 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |