| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Date: | 2007-10-09 20:20:18 |
| Message-ID: | 200710092020.l99KKIw08129@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >>
> >>> I don't see how timing has anything to do with this. You could have
> >>> added it between beta1 and beta2 after sufficient hackers discussion.
> >>>
> >> Uh, it *was* after beta1.
> >>
> >
> > Oh, so it didn't hold up beta1 --- that's good.
> >
> >
>
> No it's not.
>
> Can somebody please explain to me what beta means if you can commit new
> stuff after it has been declared?
We allow /contrib to be more lax about beta changes.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-10-09 20:22:26 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2007-10-09 20:13:50 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-10-09 20:22:26 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-10-09 20:16:23 | Re: Timezone database changes |