| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Variable substitution in psql backtick expansion |
| Date: | 2017-09-04 17:08:39 |
| Message-ID: | 4707.1504544919@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2017-09-04 18:56 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> Just had another idea: maybe make the new variable names
>> SERVER_VERSION_S
>> SERVER_VERSION_N
>> VERSION_S
>> VERSION_N
> SERVER_VERSION_STR looks better than this.
I dunno, I'm not very pleased with the "STR" idea because the verbose
version string is also a string. Documenting "S" as meaning "short"
would dodge that objection.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Verite | 2017-09-04 17:14:31 | Re: Variable substitution in psql backtick expansion |
| Previous Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2017-09-04 17:05:57 | Re: INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..] |