From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Variable substitution in psql backtick expansion |
Date: | 2017-09-04 17:17:20 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDZjgmcxSPWus7NJJSxFFmy4PB8-OZgbBq2MHbyahLvEA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2017-09-04 19:08 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > 2017-09-04 18:56 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> >> Just had another idea: maybe make the new variable names
> >> SERVER_VERSION_S
> >> SERVER_VERSION_N
> >> VERSION_S
> >> VERSION_N
>
> > SERVER_VERSION_STR looks better than this.
>
> I dunno, I'm not very pleased with the "STR" idea because the verbose
> version string is also a string. Documenting "S" as meaning "short"
> would dodge that objection.
>
>
You have to necessary read doc to understand this, and I don't think so it
is good idea.
So SERVER_VERSION_NAME looks like best solution to me.
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrien Nayrat | 2017-09-04 17:30:11 | Re: ALTER INDEX .. SET STATISTICS ... behaviour |
Previous Message | Daniel Verite | 2017-09-04 17:14:31 | Re: Variable substitution in psql backtick expansion |