Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Albert Cervera i Areny <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online
Date: 2007-08-30 13:13:29
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 29. August 2007 20:27 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
>> Also, let's recall what has previously been discussed for contrib,
>> namely that we break it out into standard modules
> But that would also mean that the documentation system is somewhat 
> modularized.  

What? No it doesn't. You have missed the key word in the sentence above: 
"standard". The idea is that the docs will describe the *standard* 
modules, i.e. those that ship with the PostgreSQL core distribution 
(because they are currently in contrib).

If you want to design a pluggable documentation system then go for it, 
but it's not required by what I understand is the consensus plan for 



In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-08-30 13:26:44
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-08-30 11:36:00
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-08-30 13:18:49
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the
Previous:From: Stefan KaltenbrunnerDate: 2007-08-30 13:10:22
Subject: Re: testing more than one configuration on a single build machine

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group