| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Albert Cervera i Areny <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online |
| Date: | 2007-08-30 13:30:11 |
| Message-ID: | 200708301530.12873.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Am Donnerstag, 30. August 2007 15:13 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
> What? No it doesn't. You have missed the key word in the sentence above:
> "standard". The idea is that the docs will describe the *standard*
> modules, i.e. those that ship with the PostgreSQL core distribution
> (because they are currently in contrib).
>
> If you want to design a pluggable documentation system then go for it,
> but it's not required by what I understand is the consensus plan for
> contrib.
That brings up additional questions such as what is standard and whose
consensus. You initially referred to Perl, and I note that Perl modules
shipped with the main Perl package ("standard"?) and those that are not
provide access to their facilities in identical ways. That's as far as I can
read your mind anyway. ;-)
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-08-30 13:43:36 | Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-30 13:26:44 | Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-08-30 13:39:36 | Re: Advice on MyXactMade* flags, MyLastRecPtr, pendingDeletes and lazy XID assignment |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-30 13:26:44 | Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online |