Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Albert Cervera i Areny <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online
Date: 2007-08-30 13:26:44
Message-ID: 26319.1188480404@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> If you want to design a pluggable documentation system then go for it,
> but it's not required by what I understand is the consensus plan for
> contrib.

I thought a large part of the desire was to improve the visibility of
the contrib docs, ie, put the docs under the noses of people who have
*not* installed or even heard of the modules. So "it's not in the docs
unless you installed it" seems counter to the point.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-08-30 13:30:11 Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-08-30 13:13:29 Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-08-30 13:30:11 Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-08-30 13:18:49 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the