| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Albert Cervera i Areny <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online |
| Date: | 2007-08-30 13:13:29 |
| Message-ID: | 46D6C279.5050200@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 29. August 2007 20:27 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
>
>> Also, let's recall what has previously been discussed for contrib,
>> namely that we break it out into standard modules
>>
>
> But that would also mean that the documentation system is somewhat
> modularized.
What? No it doesn't. You have missed the key word in the sentence above:
"standard". The idea is that the docs will describe the *standard*
modules, i.e. those that ship with the PostgreSQL core distribution
(because they are currently in contrib).
If you want to design a pluggable documentation system then go for it,
but it's not required by what I understand is the consensus plan for
contrib.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-30 13:26:44 | Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-08-30 11:36:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-08-30 13:18:49 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-08-30 13:10:22 | Re: testing more than one configuration on a single build machine |