Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Advocacy wiki

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, decibel(at)decibel(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Advocacy wiki
Date: 2007-07-25 08:34:03
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> No, stuff for end users was specifically excluded from the wiki from the 
>> outset - and that should remain the case. We don't want 'unofficial' docs 
>> springing up all over the place - that's what techdocs is for.
> Doesn't that ring the bell that maybe techdocs is not as great as we
> think?  If people are desperately looking at alternatives, that may mean
> something.  What is it?

Afaik there are no outstanding bugs or feature requests with Techdocs - 
however it does require moderation before docs are published. Perhaps 
thats what people are trying to avoid?

Regards, Dave

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2007-07-25 09:08:32
Subject: Re: Event coverage on website
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-07-25 08:29:36
Subject: Re: Advocacy wiki

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group