Re: Advocacy wiki

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, decibel(at)decibel(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Advocacy wiki
Date: 2007-07-25 08:34:03
Message-ID: 46A70AFB.7050006@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>
>> No, stuff for end users was specifically excluded from the wiki from the
>> outset - and that should remain the case. We don't want 'unofficial' docs
>> springing up all over the place - that's what techdocs is for.
>
> Doesn't that ring the bell that maybe techdocs is not as great as we
> think? If people are desperately looking at alternatives, that may mean
> something. What is it?
>

Afaik there are no outstanding bugs or feature requests with Techdocs -
however it does require moderation before docs are published. Perhaps
thats what people are trying to avoid?

Regards, Dave

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-07-25 09:08:32 Re: Event coverage on website
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-07-25 08:29:36 Re: Advocacy wiki