| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, decibel(at)decibel(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Advocacy wiki |
| Date: | 2007-07-25 15:19:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20070725151915.GA2581@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Greg Smith added to Cc:
Dave Page wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Dave Page wrote:
>>> No, stuff for end users was specifically excluded from the wiki from the
>>> outset - and that should remain the case. We don't want 'unofficial' docs
>>> springing up all over the place - that's what techdocs is for.
>> Doesn't that ring the bell that maybe techdocs is not as great as we
>> think? If people are desperately looking at alternatives, that may mean
>> something. What is it?
>
> Afaik there are no outstanding bugs or feature requests with Techdocs -
> however it does require moderation before docs are published. Perhaps thats
> what people are trying to avoid?
Maybe people don't _realize_ that techdocs is "a wiki", with on-line
editability and all. Why else would be Greg Smith resisting moving his
MySQL doc to it right away?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-07-25 15:48:53 | Re: Advocacy wiki |
| Previous Message | Gavin M. Roy | 2007-07-25 09:28:24 | Re: Event coverage on website |