Re: Advocacy wiki

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, decibel(at)decibel(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Advocacy wiki
Date: 2007-07-25 08:29:36
Message-ID: 20070725082936.GA3935@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Dave Page wrote:

> No, stuff for end users was specifically excluded from the wiki from the
> outset - and that should remain the case. We don't want 'unofficial' docs
> springing up all over the place - that's what techdocs is for.

Doesn't that ring the bell that maybe techdocs is not as great as we
think? If people are desperately looking at alternatives, that may mean
something. What is it?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2007-07-25 08:34:03 Re: Advocacy wiki
Previous Message Dave Page 2007-07-25 08:15:56 Re: Advocacy wiki