Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: David Lang <david(at)lang(dot)hm>
Cc: Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Nunes Melo <al_nunes(at)atua(dot)com(dot)br>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good
Date: 2006-08-09 16:27:41
Message-ID: 44DA0CFD.6080308@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


>> Ahh and which companies would these be? As a representative of the
>> most prominent one in the US I can tell you that you are not speaking
>> from a knowledgeable position.
>
> note I said many, not all. I am aware that your company does not fall
> into this catagory.

I know, but I am curious as to *what* companies. Any reputable
PostgreSQL company is going to support Linux as a whole except maybe
some fringe distros like Gentoo or RedFlag. Not to mention FreeBSD and
Solaris.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> David Lang
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Lang 2006-08-09 16:37:37 Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2006-08-09 16:26:21 Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000